Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Table of Contents
minLevel1
maxLevel6
include
outlinefalse
indent
styledisc
exclude
typelist
class
printabletrue

Structures

  • Specify Test Standards when we report results (Team 11 BYU)

  • More detailed documentation, both written and photographed, of the tube winding process (Team 11 BYU)

  • Look into vacuum bagging for tubes (Team 11 BYU)

  • Look into oven curing for tubes (Team 11 BYU)

  • 8 Layer, 90-degree winds (Team 11 BYU)

  • Run CFD on fins (Team 11 BYU)

  • Bolt Force Calculations (Team 11 BYU)

  • List all assumptions for calculations (Team 11 BYU)

  • Look into vacuum bagging for nosecone (Team 15 Carleton University)

Avionics

  • Efficient PCB stacking system (Team 15 Carleton University)

  • All transmissions from SRAD boards done over LoRa (Team 15 Carleton University)

Recovery

  • Use dual bay deployment (Team 11 BYU)

  • Use dual bay deployment (Team 15 Carleton University)

  • SRAD Parachute (Team 15 Carleton University)

  • Validate Cd of chutes and streamers using test flights (Team 15 Carleton University)

Payload

  • Interesting guided payload (Team 15 Carleton University)

Tech Report Improvements

  • Format and write about team leadership structure more clearly and professionally (Team 11 BYU)

  • Test Standards when we report results (Team 11 BYU)

  • More detailed tube winding process (Team 11 BYU)

  • List all assumptions for calculations (Team 11 BYU)

  • Sensitivity analysis for all calculations/assumptions (Donovan's suggestion)

  • DTEG requirements table for each subteam at the start of the section (Team 15 Carleton University)

  • Include more information about the ground station (Team 15 Carleton University)

  • Cleaner CONOPS layout (Team 15 Carleton University)

  • Possibly split avionics into transmitting and not transmitting (Team 15 Carleton University)