Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Overarching decision: Physically a backplane or practically a backplane?

  • Do we want the backplane PCB to physically hold all other boards and they must slot in, or are wire connections OK?

Targets (Maximum/Minimums/Targets):

Pin Count: 

  • More is better, at least X
  • JE – Don't know what systems are on boards yet, but I doubt you'll have much trouble with this

Max Current:

  • At least X
  • JE – Don't know what systems are on boards yet, but I doubt you'll have much trouble with this

Max Voltage:

  • At least X (25V?)

Fabrication Method:

  • Board-independent; connector functionality should not rely on certain mechanical characteristics of the PCB
  • Reversible: connector should not be irreversible or irremovable, in event of damage
  • Requires no specialized, high-cost tools. 
  • Bonus points; ability to act as a wire-to-board connector as well, for use in debugging. 

Mechanical Connection:

  • Keyed; the obvious one
  • Positive latching; IREC compliance, resistance to vibration

Assembly Difficulty:

  1. THC - Through Hole Connector (Easiest)
  2. SMD - Wide Pitch (Not Complicated but requires additional equipment)
  3. SMD - Tight Pitch (Hard - Potential for shorts)

Part Availability: 

Cost (<$5 Per Connector)

Connector Name#PinsMax CurrentMax VoltageFabrication MethodMechanical ConnectionAssembly DifficultyPart AvailabilityCost






















































































  • No labels