Overall Notes
Structures
Requirements
Distinguish between should and shall with DTEG reqs
Consistency in dimensions (diameter, radius)
Use testing over analysis for FoS
OpenRocket
10 mph wind case
Loki Research motor
Both satisfy rod speed req using base mass
Motor Selection
TWR calculated with ~28 kg mass
CTI issues (can be elaborated on later)
Is the Loki motor in stock? (need to check on that)
Need to do a more in-depth price comparison for jumping to N-class
Have we considered the M6000? (large overshoot)
Motor unreliability as we jump classes? (likely a non-issue, consult tech reports to confirm)
Loki motor burns blue, pretty cool
Prioritize off-rod velocity
Test parts to higher stresses if concerned with a more powerful motor
Nose Cone
Is the strength difference between CF and FG a valid concern?
What is the basis for saying CF is easier to remove from a mold than FG?
Are we considering different shapes at this stage?
Not considering other than a tangent ogive
Possibly look at Von Karman
Don’t worry about a tip for Mach reasons if under Mach 1
Body Tubes
Layup has less surface finish work than winding (except for seam line)
Layup strength comparison is dependent on the direction of fibers in purchased cloth
For winding where would we apply graphite powder?
Consider using the paint booth for heated cure cycle (look at temperatures needed and temperatures that can be achieved)
Winding pattern (current 60/30) though to change because of manufacturing process
Find out weight difference between layup and winding
Consider mechanical improvements to the X-Winder (in progress already)
FG frays far more during winding
Consider sourcing better FG tow
Prepreg FG tow?
How does cost per weight translate to cost per length unit of tube?
Bulkheads
Spar thicknesses vary a lot
Uniform spar thicknesses for testing and adding fillets to the thin membrane
Decrease overall bulkhead thickness (.5” to .375” or .25”)
Consider mounting space when looking at spar design
Why does the four-spar bulkhead maintain equivalent strength as a solid bulkhead with less mass?
Section moment considerations
Rail Buttons
SRAD
Why not machine plastic rail guides?
Aluminum rail button testing on L1s?
Plastic is actually easier to machine
Are these rail buttons better than COTS?
Not many teams use SRAD
Combo Al/Delrin rail buttons
COTS
Boat Tail
3D Printing
Consider heat deflection temperature, not melting temperature
Glass Transition temp for PETG is around 80 degrees Celcius (per Deeb)
Consider simply using PETG again if using same or lower-thrust motor
Careful is going to Loki or higher
Consider layer height for printing
Worth testing layer height strength properties
Composite Layup
Is the compressive strength worth it here if using a fibrous material?
Fins
Numerical optimization for fins
Concern about lack of fin tabs if using tip-to-tip layup
Thrust Plate and Motor Retainer
The screw size restriction was due to the size of retainer
Think about screw on and one “locking” screw through both pieces
Slide 45: NO
Blockers
Avionics
Requirements
Minimize in-field assembly time by doing more before arriving at the VLA
Wiring Diagram
Add switches to GPS
Careful about where wires plug into
Backplane
Connectors
Move placement of connectors
Consider alternatives for bulkhead wire pass-throughs
Flight Computers
Why only RRC?
Because
Trackers
Featherweight ground station data can be sent to our ground station
Featherweight is more reliable
Cost of featherweight is comparable
Working ground station is good
Big Red Bee size is far larger
HORUS will not get drowned out
Live Video Transmission
HDMI connections can be somewhat unstable
Perhaps mitigate by using a small 3D print bracket
Drone cameras will likely be rated for higher G loads than the rocket will experience
Range ratings are likely unreliable and should be tested
RF transparent materials can still affect the signals
Live video challenge requires 1080p 30 FPS
Bad video is still worth something
Interference concerns with transmitting on crowded bands
Video transmitters can shift frequencies
Need to see if MCC approves that
Need to consider the drain timeline
Consider sending a turn-on signal to start the live video
It could also use boost detection
Really need to deep dive into how we can safely remotely turn it on without missing boost
Heat Management
EMI generation is likely a non-issue
Thermally conductive plastics
Turning on the runcams close to flight could negate the need for an airflow solution
External heat sink can cause more damage upon recovery
Test a large amount for fan system
Figure out activation issue before heat management to understand how much heat management is truly needed
EMI could also throw off magnetometers on non-flight critical components
Battery Chemistry
No individual lithium-ion cells
Look at batteries with leads rather than contacts
Engineering Cameras
LED is to help ease the exposure shock from brightness in NM
Come up with the number and location of modules
What view are we looking at for live video?
Need to have a large camera discussion with multiple subteams
Avionics Bay
Removeable Bulkhead
Inset Edge Circle contains the load and makes the connection weaker
Clover should not have a manufacturability issue
Add in a flat on the clover for keying
Clover design can only be epoxied on one side for fillets and the application must be careful to not impact the keying geometry
Consider how deep in the tube the clover is
Consider what tools can fit in to actually screw in the key
Material Selection for Skeleton
Waterjet isn’t as much of an issue this year
Check Metals Depot for Aluminum
Component Mounting
Label things
Removable top if implementing fixed sleds
General Improvements
Recovery
Requirements
Take care to follow the main altitude deployment DTEG
Give time for the main to inflate to meet the speed req
Consider how payload’s recovery system deploys
Streamer
Mitigate the length of the harness to reduce tangle risk
Dual Bay helps with this
Understand why we use a streamer instead of a chute for drogue
Consider Pilot Chutes
Main Chute
Find out and compare chutes based on descent rates
Decide on the correct size for the mass of our rocket (likely larger this year)
Vented chutes open far slower than non-vented
Put more thought into other factors surrounding descent rate decision
Consider Pilot Chutes
Links
May need to buy more quick links
Visual indicators for quick link tightness
Shock Cord
Maybe look into lower-rated shock cord
ESRA might want us to use 5000 lb for some reason
Ratchet Straps?
Cord Length needs to be figured out
Watch for corrosive BP protection
Consider how to secure the line protector
Sewing
Compare cut resistance of shock protector
Could attach COTS protection with heat shrink on either end
Reference OMEN Tech Report for Separation Shock Calculator
Foxhunt
Figure out where to place foxhunt beacons in the rocket
Look into other foxhunt beacon options
RS41 can possibly act as foxhunt beacon in AV bay
Test
HAB streamer tests?
Blockers
Consider Wildman Rocketry as a recovery component supplier
Payload
Requirements
Make sure payload can transmit without extended member
Recovery has not imposed any interface requirements
Sabot keying requirement
Extendable Antenna
Dust considerations hindering mechanical systems
Sheet metal manufacturing should be somewhat simple
Fishing line as an extendable string
Consider using the extension as a 2m antenna
Self-Righting Mechanism
Figure out what to do if it lands on the top or bottom
Round bottom and modify sabot
Is it worth the cost of a COTS emergency HAM inflatable antenna?
Too large of a package for the member
Frame Ideas
The Back Plate has more strength concerns due to larger moments
Stilt City - thanks yev
Offset parachute introduces more concentrated stresses and increases the possibility of shearing shroud lines due to contact with edges of the payload
Parachute Antenna
Mini Chutes
Crazy antennas are mitigated simply by another tracker
Extra parachute is a massive tangle risk
Battery Options
Use packages with leads not individual cells
Flat pack battery options
Cameras
Second lens on cam #2 has both analog and digital lenses
Also considering the same higher-end runcams as Avionics
Sabot
Change where the shock cord pass through is located
Does not fit into tube tightly as is
If implementing the band idea run it through both sides
SRAD PCB
Scope creep concerns
Most of this can be reused in terms of board design from previous boards
Figure out if the PCB provides power to servos as well as control
GPS Tracking
Finished